Search for: "Apple v. Apple" Results 341 - 360 of 6,982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2022, 11:42 pm by Florian Mueller
This may be one of my shortest blog posts ever, but I have two pieces of news to share regarding the Ericsson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:13 am by Florian Mueller
On Monday, Apple had a deadline for its opening brief in the appeal of the final ruling in the first Apple v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
 This argument formed the basis of the dissent to one of the key cases the FBI relies upon,  United States v New York Telephone Co., 434 US159 (1977). [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 1:46 am by Florian Mueller
Specifically, Qualcomm offered to pay Apple the nearly $1 billion it owed if Apple would, in Qualcomm's words:(i) publicly and specifically retract and correct each of Apple's misstatements about Qualcomm to regulatory agencies [...]; (ii) inform the relevant agencies that such statements were and are untrue; (iii) disclose Apple’s correspondence with any agencies relating to any investigation of Qualcomm;10 (iv) provide any and all additional… [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 5:23 am by Florian Mueller
(Also, the situation surrounding the '915 pinch-to-zoom API patent, which the USPTO's Central Reexamination Division rejected last month, could lead to further complications, as I discussed in my post on the renewed motion.)Since the parties already briefed the court extensively on the eBay v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:36 am by Jessica Fletcher
On December 13, Mac News World published an article titled, “Apple Breaks Legal Serve in Samsung’s Home Court. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:11 am by Ted Frank
In the In re Apple MagSafe Power Adapter Litigation, the attorneys walked away with $3.1 million, while the class got less than $1 million, and likely less than a quarter of what the attorneys got. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Riley Macdonald
Fortnite Removed from Apple’s App Store and the Google Play Store as Epic Games Sues in Antitrust Battle Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]