Search for: "Asbestos Legal Center" Results 341 - 360 of 450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
”) LEGAL COMMENTARY Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 337 (2d ed. 2000)( “A final caveat is that employing the results of group-based studies of risk to make a causal determination for an individual plaintiff is beyond the limits of epidemiology. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:27 am by Schachtman
  Unfortunately, expert witnesses in legal proceedings sometimes do not feel the normative force of Wittgenstein’s Proposition 7, and they speak without restraint. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:18 pm
Afterwards seek advice on your legal rights. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Lead, ATSDR Did you husband work with asbestos? [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:27 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
  "Those working in the roofline products industry must check for the presence of asbestos and be fully aware of the legal requirements for working with asbestos-containing materials. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:10 am by Joe Consumer
Chamber of Commerce and its "Institute for Legal Reform," which issues easy-to-follow instructions for states seeking to wipe out the legal rights of people injured by corporate wrongdoing while smearing certain state business climates and selling out small businesses. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:10 am by Joe Consumer
Chamber of Commerce and its "Institute for Legal Reform," which issues easy-to-follow instructions for states seeking to wipe out the legal rights of people injured by corporate wrongdoing while smearing certain state business climates and selling out small businesses. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
      How to comply with legal requirements when working with asbestos. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
”  Multi-plaintiff trial consolidation was a bad idea in asbestos cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm by Walter Olson
Judge Kozinski blasts prosecution of McAfee exec Probhat Goyal [Ribstein, Greenfield; related on federal overcriminalization, Rittgers/Cato] “If only laws were like sausages” [Robert Pear, NY Times] “Public Radio Looks at California ADA Lawsuits” [Frith, CJAC on "This American Life," Thomas Mundy and Morse Mehrban] Guitar maker described as “litigation-addled”: “Gibson continues its IP-based business plan” [Coleman] Judge who heard… [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 10:22 am by Schachtman
”  Furthermore, consulting for legal counsel, or testifying at counsel’s request, would appear to be a “personal interest. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court on Monday moved into the center of a spreading legal controversy over public subsidies for political candidates, granting review of a pair of cases involving Arizona’s so-called “clean elections” law. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:06 pm by Steven M. Taber
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:17 pm by Steve Matthews
Addiction treatment center The Meadows posted a schedule of free lectures coming up throughout the fall in various cities across the US, Canada, and the UK. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:54 pm by Steve Matthews
Hissey Kientz LLP launched their new Mesothelioma Lawsuit Blog, covering news and legal commentary on developments in asbestos law and lawsuits involving mesothelioma. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm by Justin Walsh
Anderson, who lived in Manhattan, died at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Although the demolition or renovation of a single-family residence is exempt from Asbestos NESHAP requirements, the exemption does not apply where the demolition is part of a larger commercial project. [read post]