Search for: "Bayer v. State"
Results 341 - 360
of 645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2009, 5:22 pm
See, e.g., Glencore, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
Gatlin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:14 am
State of New York U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Bayer Corp., no. 09-1205 (U.S.). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 12:25 pm
Bayer Corp., 131 S. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 10:37 pm
Saleh v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer’s settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:32 am
Byrd v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 4:32 am
Bayer CropScience L.P., 563 F.3d 302 (8th Cir. 2009). [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
He indicated that two companies have already made NMSP submissions: (i) DuPont and (ii) 2PI, and that ten others have provided letters of intent to participate: (i) BASF; (ii) Bayer; (iii) Dow; (iv) Evonik; (v) GE; (vi) Nanocyl; (vii) Nanophase; (viii) PPG; (ix) Sasol North America; and (x) Strem Chemical. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am
Law: US v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
BackgroundIn July 2016 Bayer Intellectual Property (the Applicant) sough to register the figurative sign above as an EU trade mark. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
See Chang v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:56 pm
" --Bayer v Neiman Marcus Holdings, Inc, NDCal, November 8, 2011, Case No. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Bayer. [read post]
