Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 341 - 360
of 3,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2017, 3:01 pm
The question — should this be read as employees involved in (a) canning, (b) processing, (c) preserving, (d) freezing, (e) drying, (f) marketing, (g) storing, (h) packing for shipment, or (i) distribution of those products — a broad interpretation, favored by the employer — or (a) canning, (b) processing, (c) preserving, (d) freezing, (e) drying, (f) marketing, (g) storing, or (h) packing for shipment or distribution of those products — a… [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
[C.] [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:18 am
If a letter is returned unopened, Chief Justice John G. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:21 am
An opposition was filed under Article 100 (a), (b) and (c) EPC against the granted patent on the grounds that the subject-matter of the granted patent lacked novelty and inventive step, was not sufficiently disclosed, and extended beyond the content of the application as filed.III. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:09 am
“The words of the Lanham Act should not be stretched to cover matters that are typically of no consequence to purchasers. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
Nor has the [applicant] provided any compelling evidence that this might not be so.Moreover, the particular questions raised by the [applicant] are specific to a very limited field of subject-matter and – in contrast to, say, the questions addressed in G 3/08 relating to computer implemented inventions – are of small relevance outside that field. [read post]
5 May 2008, 12:10 pm
G. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:23 am
/V.P., on subsidiary jurisdiction under Regulation 650/2012 (comment by G. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:21 pm
Admittedly, I do not typically have enough time in class to unpack all of these aspects of the Google matter. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
A method of creating an interactive virtual community of people in a field of endeavor, comprising the steps of: a) selecting a field of endeavor; b) compiling a list of members in the selected field; c) selecting a member from the compiled list of members based on a preselected factor; d) obtaining biographical information about the selected member; e) processing the biographical information in a preselected format to create a personal profile of the selected member; f) publishing the… [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm
This follows from the consideration that - in accordance with R 43(1) – the invention in the European patent application is defined by the subject-matter of a claim, i.e. the specific combination of features present in the claim, as is reminded in opinion G 2/98 [2] of the Enlarged Board of Appeal. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 5:47 am
Stafford and Michael C. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:57 pm
John G. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:48 pm
Hulu, LLC, the Court stated that “[t]his court has never set forth a bright line rule requiring district courts to construe claims before determining subject matter eligibility. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
KG had taken the place of the company G. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
James G. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Rosas, G. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 8:53 am
§ 6105(c)(4). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:04 am
Reading Rule 403 of Boston’s Hackney Carriage Rules and Massachusetts’ independent contractor statute, G. [read post]
19 May 2020, 6:22 am
The argument was presented in the amicus curaie that legislative decisions on matters of fundamental importance should not be left to administrative bodies to make by means of administrative regulations, i.e. by the AC amending the [read post]
