Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2016, 7:59 am
From Monday’s decision in Doe v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:26 am
The narrative is grounded in Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University director Jameel Jaffer’s question begging about the nature of OlC opinions. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
Will Gill v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:49 am
–NetChoice v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Anyway. this is what you missed last week:* The Key to Confusion: Supreme Court of BC decides on Keyword Advertising and Passing OffJani recounts the tale of Vancouver Community College v Vancouver Career College 2015 BCSC 1470, a challenging case concerning a trade mark used as keyword in online advertising which just decided by the Supreme Court of British Columbia.* Draft consultation on online platforms leaked: does the EU really want ISPs to do (much)… [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:54 am
Wilson, a Columbia University professor who served on the city commission to reconsider the statue and was consulted on the exhibition. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 11:32 am
Pitel, Faculty of Law, Western University Eritrean mine workers who fled from that country to British Columbia sued the mine’s owner, Nevsun Resources Ltd. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:51 pm
Related Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:42 am
“McCormick is significant in its rejection of the [British Columbia Court of Appeal’s] strict reasoning that partners cannot be ‘employees’ of their own partnerships, and does open the door to at least the possibility that other classes of partners will be able to claim the protection of human rights legislation as ‘employees. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
At least one law professor agrees: "I go with the Senate on this one," said Richard Briffault, a professor at Columbia University and an expert on state constitutional law. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am
In contrast, in essentially identical litigation relying on essentially identical arguments in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia—where the presumption does not apply— Petitioners were allowed to permissively intervene alongside the Department. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
In Sarei v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 6:08 pm
District of Columbia 12/10/08UMG Recordings v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm
The outcome of this review was uncertain given the opposite conclusion in Trinity Western University v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
British Columbia (Transportation and Highways). [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
Indeed, in a recent interview with Columbia University president Lee Bollinger (the named respondent in Grutter), Attorney General Eric Holder argued that affirmative action policies should be generally expanded: “The question is not when does [affirmative action] end, but when does it begin … When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled? [read post]
