Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am
It noted, however, that compelled “quick peek” procedures, in which the producing party does not agree to the process, see Fairholme Funds Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am
It noted, however, that compelled “quick peek” procedures, in which the producing party does not agree to the process, see Fairholme Funds Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Just because a company uses an alternative method to go public does not mean that its investors are any less deserving of time-tested investor protections. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
At a recent Columbia Law School colloquium, participants posed a foundational question: How do corporate law standards of fiduciary duty relate to what scientists call the “climate emergency”? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
They relied on the Supreme Court of Canada’s earlier decision in Trinity Western University v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
Ten days later, on Thursday, December 3, 2009, the New York Appellate Division ruled 3-2 in favor of the property owners in the Columbia University project. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
Baze v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:26 am
The narrative is grounded in Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University director Jameel Jaffer’s question begging about the nature of OlC opinions. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 12:35 pm
In her concurring opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:45 pm
Here is the abstract: In Graham v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
Will Gill v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:49 am
–NetChoice v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Anyway. this is what you missed last week:* The Key to Confusion: Supreme Court of BC decides on Keyword Advertising and Passing OffJani recounts the tale of Vancouver Community College v Vancouver Career College 2015 BCSC 1470, a challenging case concerning a trade mark used as keyword in online advertising which just decided by the Supreme Court of British Columbia.* Draft consultation on online platforms leaked: does the EU really want ISPs to do (much)… [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
At least one law professor agrees: "I go with the Senate on this one," said Richard Briffault, a professor at Columbia University and an expert on state constitutional law. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am
In contrast, in essentially identical litigation relying on essentially identical arguments in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia—where the presumption does not apply— Petitioners were allowed to permissively intervene alongside the Department. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
In Sarei v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 6:08 pm
District of Columbia 12/10/08UMG Recordings v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 1:53 pm
From a motion filed today in Doe v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:51 pm
Related Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
