Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University" Results 341 - 360 of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2019, 4:26 am by SHG
The narrative is grounded in Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University director Jameel Jaffer’s question begging about the nature of OlC opinions. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
 Anyway. this is what you missed last week:* The Key to Confusion: Supreme Court of BC decides on Keyword Advertising and Passing OffJani recounts the tale of Vancouver Community College v Vancouver Career College 2015 BCSC 1470, a challenging case concerning a trade mark used as keyword in online advertising which just decided by the Supreme Court of British Columbia.* Draft consultation on online platforms leaked: does the EU really want ISPs to do (much)… [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:53 am by Josh Blackman
At least one law professor agrees: "I go with the Senate on this one," said Richard Briffault, a professor at Columbia University and an expert on state constitutional law. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am by Eugene Volokh
In contrast, in essentially identical litigation relying on essentially identical arguments in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia—where the presumption does not apply— Petitioners were allowed to permissively intervene alongside the Department. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 2:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The outcome of this review was uncertain given the opposite conclusion in Trinity Western University v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:33 am by Jonathan Woolley
British Columbia (Transportation and Highways). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm by Gail Heriot and John Eastman
  Indeed, in a recent interview with Columbia University president Lee Bollinger (the named respondent in Grutter), Attorney General Eric Holder argued that affirmative action policies should be generally expanded:   “The question is not when does [affirmative action] end, but when does it begin … When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled? [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Finally the European Court does not consider the fines and the substantial award of damages as disproportionate to the legitimate aim pursued, arguing that the applicants gave no evidence that these sanctions had “financially strangled” them : “La Cour observe tou [read post]