Search for: "Edwards v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 4,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2008, 12:21 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Indiana v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:41 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: LUKE EDWARD MICKELSON v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:46 pm
In an earlier post today, I mentioned Cone v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:45 pm
(Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District, January 21, 2020, Techno Lite, Inc., v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:07 pm by Christopher Mathews
If true, it would be difficult to see how the prosecution could secure a conviction in light of United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:20 am by CJLF Staff
  Though this practice has been very common during jury selection, in its 1995 ruling, State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:25 pm
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Penumbra currently features an online debate between Professors Bradley Smith (Capital University Law School) and Edward Foley (Moritz College of Law-Ohio State University) on voter identification requirements and Crawford v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:40 am by tracey
Supreme Court Gnango, R. v [2011] UKSC 59 (14 December 2011) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor [2011] UKSC 60 (14 December 2011) Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 58 (14 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Revenue And Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership [2011] EWCA Civ 1578 (20 December 2011) Ablyazov & Ors v JSC BTA Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 1588 (20… [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:25 am
In Justin Mayhew v (1) Philip King (2) Milbank Trucks Ltd (Defendants) & Chaucer Insurance plc (Third Party and Part 20 Claimant) v Towergate Stafford Knight Company Limited & Ors Sir Edward Evans-Lombe held that a term of a settlement agreement which stated that a right to an indemnity would cease if the party with the benefit of the indemnity went into administration was contrary to the anti-deprivation principle and would be struck out.The claimant,… [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:25 am
In Justin Mayhew v (1) Philip King (2) Milbank Trucks Ltd (Defendants) & Chaucer Insurance plc (Third Party and Part 20 Claimant) v Towergate Stafford Knight Company Limited & Ors Sir Edward Evans-Lombe held that a term of a settlement agreement which stated that a right to an indemnity would cease if the party with the benefit of the indemnity went into administration was contrary to the anti-deprivation principle and would be struck out.The claimant,… [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am by Josh Blackman
His resignation came shortly after the Supreme Court unanimously decided United States v. [read post]