Search for: "Eric Segall" Results 341 - 360 of 447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2022, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Eric Segall, by contrast, analyzing Roberts’ decisions for “Dorf on Law,” argues that the defining feature of Chief Justice Roberts’ jurisprudence is not his alleged institutionalism but his “non-judicial hubris. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Eric Segall explains why, as the Supreme Court prepares to consider Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
”  And in The Atlantic, Eric Segall argues that the case is “a political challenge to the ACA dressed up in legal garb. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
By ERIC PFANNER "Policy makers are trying to bring Internet access to the masses while seeking to curb illegal copying of digital music, movies and video games. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Karen Tani
Subscribers get Darryl Pinckney's take on Manning Marable's Malcolm X ("The Two Conversions of Malcolm X"); Robert Gottlieb's review of a new biography of Ethel Waters ("The Mother of Us All"); and Eric J. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am by Edith Roberts
Eric Segall contends in The Daily Beast that, contrary to much recent hand-wringing by “legal pundits and academic Court watchers” about the ills of an evenly divided eight-member Court, “there are many advantages to such a Court, and we might all be better off if both political parties in the Senate made a commitment to keep this balance permanent. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
  I previewed the case earlier this week in Plain English; other coverage and commentary come from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times (registration may be required), Julie Appleby of Kaiser Health News (via Philly.com), Paul Barrett of Bloomberg, Elizabeth Wydra in an op-ed for The Washington Post, Joel Ario, Michael Kolber, and Deborah Bachrach at The Commonwealth Fund Blog, David Nather and Jennifer Haberkorn of Politico Pro, Sarah Kliff of Vox, Larry Levitt and Gary Claxton at the Kaiser… [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
” In The Daily Beast, Eric Segall argues that the “Constitution itself has very little to do with most constitutional-law cases, and if the justices are going to exercise a strong power of judicial review, that reality is, indeed, a very good thing. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:26 am by James Romoser
(Jonathan Adler, The Volokh Conspiracy) Justice Barrett (Human Rights At Home Blog) Barrett Faces Gauntlet of Challenges in First Weeks As Justice (Kevin Daley, The Washington Free Beacon) In Nominating Amy Coney Barrett To The Supreme Court, Trump Is Following In The Footsteps Of Lyndon Johnson And Richard Nixon (Michael Bobelian, Forbes) Breaking and Analysis: Supreme Court, on 5-3 Party Line Vote, Won’t Restore Wisconsin Ballot Deadline Extension; Justices Fight in Footnotes over… [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall looks ahead at Evenwel v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by Marissa Miller
  At Slate, Eric Segall – a self-described “liberal constitutional law professor. . . and loyal Democrat” – argues that, “as a matter of both principle and law, Kagan should not hear the case. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 11:58 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Indeed, my co-blogger Eric Segall wrote an excellent column last week discussing an essay by Thomas Homer-Dixon, a Canadian scholar who studies "the causes of war, social breakdown, revolution, ethnic violence and genocide" and who warned in a recent opinion piece in The Toronto Globe and Mail that "Canada must prepare" for the possible collapse of the American polity.I highly recommend Professor Segall's column, which summarizes the issues… [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
Since 2005, I have assigned 90 books by 83 authors, with Sandy Levinson, Gerard Magliocca, Eric Segall, Dan Farber, Philip Hamburger, Kim Roosevelt, and David Bernstein each making more than 1 appearances. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:04 pm by Kim Zetter
Segal saw three reasons the Chinese might eventually taper off this activity, though he wasn’t convinced they would actually do so. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:30 am by Mark Graber
  As Thomas Keck documents in THE MOST ACTIVISTSUPREME COURT IN HISTORY (see also Eric Segall’s fine piece in the Wake Forest Law Review), Scalia was among the least restrained justices who ever sat on the federal bench. [read post]