Search for: "Friedman v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
Howard Friedman (Religion Clause) for the pointer. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Frank Miniter argues that the Court should hold that warrantless GPS tracking is a violation of the Fourth Amendment in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 2:06 am
” “Here, because Brooks plead guilty to certain tax evasion counts, those convictions were not abated by the Second Circuit in United States v Brooks (872 F3d 78, 87-88 [2d Cir 2017)). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:01 pm
In Shapiro v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935); Nortz v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
Howard Friedman [Religion Clause] and Victor Steinbok for the pointer); so I thought I’d repost the item I wrote about the trial court decision in March:There’s been much talk about the trial court decision in Mansour v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
United States, 14-10443, and Lopez v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Friedman, “Take Two Of These & Sue Me In The Morning: Efficacy of the Learned Intermediary Doctrine in Prescription Drug Failure To Warn Cases,” 22 St. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:57 am
United States, a recent decision from the CIT.The issue came up in the context of swimwear that was imported into the United States and then sent to a warehouse in Canada to be held in inventory until sold. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
& Pol’y 443 (2012) Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-24 Abstract: The United States Supreme Court has decided several cases concerning expert testimony and the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
& Pol’y 443 (2012) Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-24 Abstract: The United States Supreme Court has decided several cases concerning expert testimony and the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
& Pol’y 443 (2012) Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-24 Abstract: The United States Supreme Court has decided several cases concerning expert testimony and the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:57 am
The Assembly recalls that the European Court of Human Rights has already stated in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and others v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
It has members throughout the United States that have a tangible interest in this case. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 4:24 pm
United States, 581 F.3d 1369, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
25 May 2021, 3:32 pm
United States. [read post]
10 May 2021, 5:36 pm
In this case, the workers had been employed at call centers operated by AT&T in the United States. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
