Search for: "Goldstein v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 1,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2008, 11:10 pm
Below, Kevin previews tomorrow’s argument in No. 07-6984, Jimenez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by David Zaring
  As Tom Goldstein predicted, CJ Roberts wrote the 5-4 opinion. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:22 am by Joel Goldstein
Assistant to the Solicitor General Erica Ross, representing the United States, followed Phillips. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case:  United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Rachel Sachs
At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner profiles Edith Windsor, the plaintiff in this Term’s United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm by William Baude
Melissa Sherry, arguing for the United States and supporting the deputized DEA agent’s side of the case, began by diving in to the differences between Calder and the current case. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague, “is a huge deal in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 6:01 am by Amy Howe
In the wake of last summer’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Robert Glicksman analyzes last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]