Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 341 - 360 of 984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
·       On April 27, 2021, Facebook filed a notice of supplemental authority regarding AMG, arguing that, following the Supreme Court’s decision “the FTC lacks statutory authority to maintain its lawsuit in federal district court. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
This post examines a recent decision of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:37 am by azatty
  When a unanimous Arizona Supreme Court decided Flagstaff Affordable Housing Limited Partnership v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 10:23 am by admin
Town of Milton Board of Health v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 10:40 am by Kevin
According to the superior court, “[t]he factual framework in this case is nebulous and punctuated by many contradictions. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 6:53 am
Stern, Presiding Judge for Administration, Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:13 pm by Mark Ashton
Mellon Bank, NA, the Superior Court said that in Pennsylvania, property subject to court orders is not subject to attachment by judicial liens. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 9:07 am
A proposed new Uniform Superior Court Rule and a model Parenting Plan have been promulgated, as part of the implementation of House Bill 369 on January 1, 2008. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
  The Justice Department and President Biden previously authorized former officials to testify to the House Oversight and Senate Judiciary committees about the Trump administration’s attempts to subvert the election results. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:10 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
In this case, SLAM filed a complaint in federal district court to prevent authorities from seizing the mummy mask in its possession. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Chagares filed a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (Trzaska v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:03 pm
Here is the relevant language from the Court's order:The Washington Supreme Court diverged from California v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
[recognizing cell phone searches typically reveal far more private information to the police than most house searches]; Missouri v. [read post]