Search for: "In re Bartlett" Results 341 - 360 of 392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
Some think that the House Iraq supplemental funding can lead to a confrontation with the President in the Supreme Court: If [Bush] ignores [the House proposal], we sue and the courts enforce it. if he ignores that, we're in massive constitutional crisis. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
  The Court spent an hour Tuesday talking about different approaches, in Bartlett v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Bartlett, a plaintiff can normally only bring a federal civil rights claim alleging that she was arrested in retaliation for exercising her First Amendment rights if she can show that there was no probable cause to arrest her. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:07 am by Bexis
 That simplifies things, even if it probably does some violence to what Congress actually thought it was doing.(9)  The Court's list of "across the board" comment k states will be useful when we're in those states. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Princeton was represented by lawyers from Lowenstein Sandler and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:38 am by Glenn Reynolds
And reader Fred Bartlett agrees: I have used a couple, but discovered that they don’t save that much time and produce an inferior product. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:04 am
"If it had dropped another 300 points, then some of the companies might have had second thoughts about some of the M&A deals we're working on," says Fenwick & West's Daniel Winnike. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 1:41 pm
            In In re Actos (Pioglitazone) Prods. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bob Bourque, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP Outside counsel’s perspective: the network option is strategically important where a controversial commercial has just begun airing. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Employment Law(RES) KF3464 .F738 2010Employment discrimination / Joel Wm. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:12 am
We're providing these start dates by firm name, and by date (thanks in part to the help of Breaking Media's Winnie Liu). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Peter Huang
    As comedian Dave Barry jokingly points out, "the human race is far too stupid to be deterred from tourism by a mere several million years of bad experiences, and today we’re traveling in larger numbers than ever. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:00 am by Daniel Shaviro
(Plenty of conservatives would agree with this diagnosis, by the way – try asking Bruce Bartlett and David Frum.)Why have the Repubs gone stark raving mad? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
It was the last blank space on the legal map – the only state with no precedent whatsoever. [read post]