Search for: "In re INITIATIVE STATE QUESTION NO. 10."
Results 341 - 360
of 4,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2017, 7:36 am
This is not an anomaly: year after year, GAO protesters succeed more than 4 out of 10 times. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
No. 10-01-09 The Office of General Counsel issued the following opinion on January 28, 2010, representing the position of the New York State Insurance Department. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:22 pm
The question is whether the 2006 re-registration violated the ACPA. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm
This Part 10 closes the Symposium series. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:37 am
The court framed “the critical question” with respect to the inadvertent error argument as whether the Final Judgment, which incorporates the Redress Plan by reference, establishes an intent “for the settlement funds to be used generally toward consumer protection initiatives, untethered to [the defendant’s] third-party billing practices. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 7:09 pm
That remains an open question. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:10 pm
The date of death and state of death was not announced. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:46 am
Shapiro’s initial motion to dismiss the entire complaint was granted by the court in June 2017, stating that Shapiro’s conduct as alleged did not constitute fraud or breach of fiduciary duty, that the Estate was represented by its own counsel during the transaction in question, and that “this court can ascertain no obligation on [Shapiro’s] part to disclose his then client’s negotiation with the third party purchaser. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
On the other hand, on the question of time limits connected with the initiation of the legal process, the EBA pointed out that, in the course of the preparatory work on the EPC, a majority of the Working Party which had looked into the scope of re-establishment of rights had considered that re-establishment should not apply to the opponent because he had other means of availing himself of his rights, in particular by bringing an action for revocation before the… [read post]
30 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Initially an annotation was entered into the system to the effect that no action should be taken in the absence of instructions from Mr Z. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
“We’ve had cases who stressed they definitely didn’t have ahi poke, so we’re in the hypothesis-generating stage of trying to look at the cases in 10 different ways. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:52 am
Mar. 10, 2008), decision available here. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 9:42 am
The question then becomes what would we do? [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:11 am
Why not 14 or 10? [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 1:46 pm
Only half of the states even allow citizen-initiated ballot measures. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 2:11 pm
Compare these numbers with what existed in 2007, a “normal” economic year when initial claims and weekly certifications were around 10 questions each and could be filed via a phone call. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
A case must be removed to the federal district court that encompasses the state court where the action was initiated. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:49 am
More on eyewitness ID from the states will be in the next post. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:26 pm
For instance, you may have only 10 days after the judgement is entered to ask the court to re-open the record to get new evidence entered not initially addressed at trial. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 3:00 am
GOP Focus on Rare Noncitizen Voting May Continue Long After Election Day MSN – Patrick Marley (Washington Post) | Published: 10/26/2024 Eight states, including the swing state of North Carolina, are taking up ballot measures also that would toughen bans on noncitizen voting, part of a broad and concerted Republican effort to stoke fears that hordes of noncitizens will illegally vote for Kamala Harris and deprive Donald Trump of a return to the White House. [read post]
