Search for: "Juri v. Juri"
Results 341 - 360
of 49,815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2023, 10:58 am
The post ULISES LOPEZ v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 10:54 am
The post CHANTEE RENAE JOHNSON v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 10:52 am
The post DEVANTE STEWARD v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:28 am
But the statements were of fact, not opinion, and the verdict had a sufficient basis, the court reasoned (SEC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
From Mumma v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 2:34 pm
R v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:51 am
The post PAUL LAMAR GREEN v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 10:48 am
From yesterday's Ninth Circuit decision in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
Bald, bespectacled, and bearded—the image of a beaming Saifullah Paracha sitting at a table at McDonald’s in Karachi, Pakistan, appeared on New York Times reporter Carol Rosenberg’s Twitter on the morning of Oct. 29,2022. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Murphy v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:36 pm
To show up in the majesty of a courtroom and look the defendant in the eye when you adjudicate their fate.That's why -- back in the old days -- the Ninth Circuit held, for example, that it was structural error for a jury to sentence someone in absentia, without being physically present. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm
The Massachusetts SJC heard oral arguments on November 2, 2022 in Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 7:08 am
Jury awards nearly $50M in damages against Internet access provider for user-caused copyright infringement. * Grumpy Cat Limited v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
Equally inexcusable is Congress’s failure to extend to courts-martial the constitutional requirement that juries be unanimous. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 10:38 pm
What is particularly galling about the offense instructions given to the jury in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 12:39 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 10:11 am
A jury may agree with the prosecution—Gafken has a right to find out. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 3:14 pm
The petitioner was convicted of crimes in Oregon by nonunanimous juries before the US Supreme Court issued its decision in Ramos v. [read post]
