Search for: "Keene v. Keene" Results 341 - 360 of 1,338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: Subscript Law offers a graphic explainer for Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:53 pm
The case also illustrates that the English courts are keen to preserve the finality of arbitral awards wherever possible. [read post]
6 May 2009, 10:24 am
Maybe it's the whole "torture-memo" thing or old age or what have you, but I have a keen sense that police officers who seek a warrant are doing nothing of the sort described by Judge Fernandez. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 7:27 pm by Steve Kalar
Judge Nguyen isn’t keen on that theory, rejecting it as a matter of statutory interpretation. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
 The Review Board drew on the test set out in Star Athletica LLC v Varsity Brands Inc (137 S. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am by Tom Pritchard
Given that the Court of Appeal in this case reached its decision in favour of Mr Wood with reference to the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in (Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36), which held (in brief) that business common sense only had a part to play where the meaning of a term is ambiguous, how the Court’s decision in this case aligns with its recent decision in Arnold will be of keen interest to contract lawyers and litigators alike. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
14.53: Lord Keen QC is discussing the political nature of the Smith Commission in Scotland that led to the Scotland Act and its interaction with the Sewel Convention. 14.46: Lord Keen QC names section 28.8 of the Sewel Convention as the language of “political judgement”. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The Koushal judges were very keen to ensure that the law did not disturb the social status quo. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen looks at the briefs in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen explains that both cases are “attempting to reverse important victories won before two different federal circuit courts of appeal. [read post]