Search for: "Land v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 13,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2013, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
It also engages the American Indian experience in the United States, particularly the experience of urban Indians who have been uprooted from their native lands and disconnected from their heritage and history. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:40 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
—Austin 1994, no writ) (stating that an owner of a non-possessory interest cannot compel partition). [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Burwell (Affordable Care Act - Large Employer Mandate Exemption)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlTrent v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
State of California (Gaming Compact; Good Faith Negotiations; Land Into Trust)Sorace v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion: Two Shields Opinion An excerpt: Appellants Ramona Two Shields and Mary Louise Defender Wilson are Indians with interests in land allotted to them by the United States under the Dawes Act of 1887. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
Briefly, the Court says that claims of Native Hawaiians that the State of Hawaii could not sell or otherwise alienate lands in the state, based on the wrongfulness of... [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 5:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Whether fee lands under plenary state and local taxation and regulation (per Sherrill) constitute “Indian lands” under IGRA because those lands are located within the Cayugas’ historic reservation. 3. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 10:49 am by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The opinions of the United States Supreme Court are the law of the land and generally must be followed by all states. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Tanner Allread, Stanford University, has posted The Specter of Indian Removal: The Persistence of State Supremacy Arguments in Federal Indian Law, which appears in the Columbia Law Review:In the 2022 case of Oklahoma v. [read post]