Search for: "Little v. Williams" Results 341 - 360 of 2,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
Consumers shopping for cat litter overwhelmingly identified baking soda with C & D’s Arm & Hammer cat litter products, according to the court.The court concluded that the comparisons were at least as direct as those in Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:42 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Okay, that and I’ll admit she’s a little cute to look at. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:09 pm
  The circumstances of his crime are more than a little bit nutty, so the case lingers, with numerous inquiries into the defendant's competence to stand trial, and in April 2007, appointed counsel for the defendant -- William Figueroa -- amends the plea to not guilty by reason of insanity. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
So for his no-nonsense and lucid opinion plus his eclectic background, I’m awarding the Technology & Marketing Law’s Judge of the Day award to Judge William W. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that the justices “rejected appeals from Sherwin-Williams Co. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 7:32 am by Giles Peaker
Rosebery Housing Association Ltd v Williams & Anor (2021) EW Misc 22 (CC) Our grateful thanks to Marie Paris of Doughty Street Chambers for the following note of this County Court judgment. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:31 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Here is the story – well-presented by two lawyers from Williams Mullen – of the Seventh Circuit deciding this month, in the case of Loomis v Exelon Corporation, that holding retail class mutual fund shares, rather than cheaper institutional share classes, in a defined contribution plan was not sufficient to establish fiduciary liability. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:00 pm by Robert L. Mues
” Essentially, there is very little difference in the respective rates of divorce. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The issue of a technician's work as the basis for an expert's opinion is presently before the Court in Williams v. [read post]