Search for: "Mark Tushnet"
Results 341 - 360
of 893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2009, 7:03 am
Feldman, Michael Klarman, Alexander Keyssar, Sandy Levinson, and Mark Tushnet. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 10:39 am
.)” –Mark Tushnet, Balkinization [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:52 pm
And I can't ignore Mark Tushnet, Darkness on the Edge of Town: The Contributions of John Hart Ely to Constitutional Theory. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 8:45 am
Scholars like John McGinnis, Melissa Murray, and Mark Tushnet have wondered (without endorsement) if the Court might claim to do that by applying Casey's rule against "undue burdens" on abortion. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 8:49 am
The Federalist Society recently invited Professor Mark Tushnet and Steven Teles, a professor of political science at Johns Hopkins and the author of The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement, to discuss the fate of the Federalist Society in the wake of 25 years of marked success. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 11:19 am
Nov. 29 marked STL’s first anniversary. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:39 am
Mark Tushnet is an especially dry-eyed master of this sort of thing. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 12:54 am
Chapter 4, by Rebecca Tushnet, identifies a number of issues that registration in trade mark law gives rise to and offers further potential solutions to bulging registers and overbroad registrations [earlier work here]. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:44 am
The DMCA is 22 years old this year and the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property is marking that occasion with a series of hearings reviewing the law and inviting ideas for “reform. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 8:07 am
Mark Lemley (Stanford), Mark McKenna (Notre Dame), and Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard) have joined together in supporting the rehearing. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 6:31 am
JB: That is Mark Tushnet's view. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:21 am
Austria: The Folly of Europe, [Abstract], 5 Journal of Global Justice & Public Policy 83-105 (2019).Mark Tushnet, Trump v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 8:16 am
A committee composed of members of ACS’s Board of Academic Advisors will select 10 papers and each selected author will have the opportunity to discuss his/her paper in depth with two experienced scholars, from a group that includes Erwin Chemerinsky, Pamela Karlan, Bill Marshall, Reva Siegel, Mark Tushnet, and Adam Winkler.Papers can be in any field related to public law, including but not limited to: constitutional law, administrative law, antidiscrimination law, criminal… [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
" --Mark Tushnet "Baum offers a unique perspective on the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
”—Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law School [read post]
12 May 2013, 9:30 pm
”—Mark Tushnet, author of Why the Constitution Matters For a fuller description of the book, in Griffin's own words, check out this recent Balkinization post. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Also noted in the HLS posting are lectures by Mark Tushnet and Cass Sunstein and Dean Martha Minow's interview of Justice Elena Kagan.Speaking of Constitution Day lectures, the uproar over Sean Wilentz's op-ed in the New York Times on slavery and the Constitution, which appeared on the day of his Constitution Day lecture at Princeton, continues. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
Just for the record -- I received the following e-mail this morning, which I suppose the writer thinks is cleverly satirical:Dear MARK TUSHNET: Your report date at the EASTERN UNITED STATES Re-education Camp is: NOVEMBER 15, 2016 Bring a toothbrush. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Howse, Joanna Langille & Katie Sykes, Pluralism in Practice: Moral Legislation and the Law of the WTO After Seal Products, (George Washington International Law Review, (2015 Forthcoming)).Mark Tushnet, Civil Rights Policy, (April 2, 2015).Marc Greendorfer, Brief of Tri Valley Law as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents in Same Sex Marriage Cases Nos. 14-556, 14-562, 14-571 and 14-574, (April 2, 2015).Scott D. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:07 am
’Mark Tushnet - William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law Emeritus, Harvard Law School‘This book is a major contribution to the historiography of American law from the 1750s through the first decade of the nineteenth century, representing an important advance in our understanding of the emergence of judicial review in America. [read post]
