Search for: "Mark Tushnet"
Results 341 - 360
of 874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2017, 5:05 am
It is how a constitution is supposed to work.Sometimes what people call constitutional crises are really what Mark Tushnet has called "constitutional hardball. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:50 am
But it was a case of what Mark Tushnet calls “constitutional hardball,” indeed hardball pushed to an extreme level—a level at which the game itself may fall apart. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Macro: it is more attractive on the whole even if I’m not going to purchase disparagingly marked products. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:13 pm
Tushnet, Alan K. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
Update: A fun fact from Mark Tushnet: "For more than 125 years, the Senate has not confirmed a Supreme Court nominee chosen by a president who lost the popular vote. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
Vermeule’s colleague Mark Tushnet famously criticized the tendency of lawyers to think that they can master astrophysics (and all other disciplines) in a weekend of study. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown University (representing Law Professors on amicus brief)TM is a right to suppress speech. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:19 pm
Having insisted, with Mark Tushnet, that the AALS is a trade ass'n advocating vigorously on behalf of its member schools, Paul (and Orin, too) rightly insist that the organization can and should function as a learned society, this for the benefit of the hard-working law profs whose skills, energies, and commitments are essential to our collective mission. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 6:10 pm
HLS's Mark Tushnet has a post on conservatives and civil liberties over at Balkinization. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:45 am
I'm grateful to those who read and commented on my series of posts on the AALS annual meeting, especially but not limited to Mark Tushnet and Dan Rodriguez, who are both past presidents of the AALS. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 6:22 am
I should add as a side note that readers may be interested in this post by Mark Tushnet at Balkinization discussing whether the AALS is a learned society or something else--specifically, something more like the trade organization for law schools that I pushed against in my first post. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:11 am
Richard Schragger, Micah Schwartzman, and Nelson TebbeWe are less sanguine than Mark Tushnet that the "culture wars" are over and progressives have won, as we argue in a recent piece in Vox. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
Fortunately, of course, Trump won and Commissar Tushnet will not be running reeducation camps anytime soon. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:29 am
I figured it would not take long, between the election itself and Randy Barnett's slightly parodic (I think) recent counter-post, for Mark Tushnet to revisit his notorious Balkinization post on "abandoning defensive crouch liberal constitutionalism. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:32 am
Read the: Cato Brief. = = = = = On ScotusBlog, Prof Tushnet expands on her recent N.D. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am
Rebecca Tushnet is Professor of Law at Georgetown Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 10:32 pm
Briefs by IP profs Chris Buccafusco and Jeanne Fromer and by Mark McKenna, Mark Lemley, Chris Sprigman, and Rebecca Tushnet were discussed during the argument. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
HT reports that “the series was sponsored by Dean Martha Minow and organized by Professor Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, who also designed a reading group to complement the lectures. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:54 pm
Harvard law professor Mark Tushnet says he isn’t bothered by his inclusion on a conservative group’s new watch list of leftist professors. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Mark Tushnet, at that time a law professor at Georgetown, published an article in 2004 called “Constitutional Hardball,” where hardball is roughly the equivalent in my analogy of kicking down doors and pushing past people in ways that are unexpected and surprisingly difficult to stop.Even more surprisingly, Tushnet pointed out that the constitutional claims by the hardball-playing bullies are sometimes not obviously wrong. [read post]
