Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 341 - 360 of 16,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 1:37 am
The question whether the right to control Olympic-related advertising trumps the right to sell things that look, sound and act like trade marks but aren't [see yesterday's post here] has caused the IPKat to do a little gentle scratching. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 10:15 am
Dear Mark Helprin, I have to wonder what you would think of me if you met me. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:20 am
Fox alleged that this wrong way round evidence weighed significantly in the judge's finding of infringement, when it should have been irrelevant to the issue of trade mark infringement both as a matter of fact and as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:05 am
You can track the cases according to the judge assigned to them, or look at such issues as Claim Construction, Patent Marking, and Statutory Subject Matter. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:01 am by Dennis Crouch
However, if the case gets to trial, the patentee then has the burden of proving that it complied with Section 287 (either showing that the products were marked or they didn’t need to be marked). [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:17 pm
It's not often that a decision of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on a Community trade mark matter runs to 207 paragraphs and has its own Table of Contents (inconveniently situated at the end of the decision, where you might not immediately think of looking for it), but this morning's ruling in Joined Cases T-225/06, T-255/06, T-257/06 and T-309/06 BudÄâ [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:29 am
If the long working days of the city trade mark lawyer simply aren’t long enough for you, or your blackberry just won’t flash its evil red eye at you as regularly as you’d like, help is at hand from indie game developer The Men Who Wear Many Hats in the form of the smartphone game “Intern Saga: Trademark Lawyer”. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 10:34 am by Gene Quinn
LEMLEY: "I think Alice is a real sea change on the patentable subject matter issue. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:04 pm
No public hearing will be held.In case you're wondering why the USPTO has provided a scant 11-day lead time for comments,[T]he Interim Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Instructions relate only to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 3:03 am
Just because we haven't been blogging much about the SEC's pursuit of Mark Cuban on insider trading charges doesn't mean we're not interested. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
”  And here, I’ve learned again today that a “Don’t Walk” signal means “Run. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 7:27 am by Mike McBride
I don’t know if that is like a Congressional declaration or anything, but no matter. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 7:27 am by Mike McBride
I don’t know if that is like a Congressional declaration or anything, but no matter. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 9:05 pm by Brian Tamanaha
The pertinent passage is his closing: I myself don't find these arguments particularly strong, but that -- on the CLS view -- doesn't mean anything about what constitutional law on this matter "really" is. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A suggestive mark, like a descriptive mark, should be protected only upon a showing that the mark has developed source significance in the minds of consumers.Very interesting and largely persuasive, though I think he misreads my Gone in 60 Milliseconds--he argues that quick mistakes are very hard to correct, but my points was that (accurate) recognition delays, allegedly produced by the presence of diluting marks, haven't been shown to affect real… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:23 am by jamison
That’s just one of Mark’s projects, she says. [read post]