Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 341 - 360 of 6,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2023, 8:54 pm by CoL .net
Lortie explained that the recent US Supreme Court decision of Golan v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Testimony was taken for the record, and witnesses were subject to cross examination. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
” IPSO 022538-22 A woman v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02539-22 A woman v Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10744-22 Gannon v Basildon Echo, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09814-23 Leary v liverpoolecho.co.uk, 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or… [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The growing appreciation of the role of federal policy in racializing housing markets should counter the notion that the movement out of cities over the past 50 years is an a-political, rational matter of people “voting with their feet. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Rick Garnett
A short version, though, is that, a little more than 50 years ago, in Lemon v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
The TV presenter and naturalist Chris Packham sued the Editor of Country Squire Magazine over three allegations published on its website which alleged, among other things, that he had misled people in order to raise money for a tiger rescue charity. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Underwood, the Supreme Court invalidated a similar provision of the Alabama constitution that disenfranchised people convicted of crimes “involving moral turpitude. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The article reported on criminal proceedings at which Mr Seeley had given evidence for the prosecution, focusing on an allegation which had been put to Mr Seeley in cross-examination. [read post]