Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 341 - 360 of 3,673
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Bullough details the criticism this incident received in Angola, where more than half the people live in poverty. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
" Sometimes, headline writers exaggerate, and write sensational titles to draw people in. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Vercammen Law
., Administrator PendenteLite on behalf of the Estate of Ralph Sandor, DeceasedTracey Salmon-Smith, Esq.Justin M. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:06 am by John Stephen
Harassment investigation delay It is also important to note that the court distinguished a previous case denying summary judgment (Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]