Search for: "Roberts v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 9,419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2019, 1:40 pm by Ruthann Robson
Pflugerville Independent School District, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, Judge Robert Pittman, issued a temporary injunction against... [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:43 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
United States, the Supreme Court potentially adopted what has been... [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:09 pm
Here is an excerpt from the Introduction: On May 1, 2006, the United States Supreme Court... [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 2:59 pm by Immigration Prof
The immigration law concept of unlawful presence has played a prominent role in the Supreme Court’s evaluation of Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 5:24 pm by Ruthann Robson
DeSantis, United States District Judge Robert Hinkle of the Northern District of Florida held that the Florida statute requiring payment of fines,... [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:10 am by appealattorneylaw
Now that the Mardi Gras season is over, the federal criminal defense and immigration defense lawyers in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami Dade county may want to take a few moments moment to read a newly issued opinion from the United States Supreme Court: Kawashima v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:06 am by J. Gordon Hylton
The Cohens appealed their conviction to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
But one interesting and relevant part of the United Haulers decision is Part II.D of Robert's opinion. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:51 pm by brian
28 Mar 2012, 6:45 am by Jerry Votava
Roberts held that the government did not sufficiently prove the elements of the charges of seditious conspiracy, conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction and other weapons related charges in the case of United States v. [read post]