Search for: "Rogers v. Rogers" Results 341 - 360 of 4,917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
via Instapundit, Roger Pilon proclaims that “In its opinion today in Ricci v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
If the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:16 am by PaulKostro
ROGER SMITH and AON RE, INC., App. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:54 am by gstasiewicz
Department of Justice (DOJ) to obtain records related to the agency’s communications with Estelle Rogers, a former ACORN attorney currently serving as Director of Advocacy for the ACORN-connected organization Project Vote, President Obama’s former employer (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:01 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Anyone desiring a copy of this Rogers v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 10:27 am by Florian Mueller
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California said at the outset of today's Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:51 am by texasbar
John Albach's "End of the World" contributions that appeared in the January 2000 column spawned two contributions of unusual, but very "nice" contract provisions:(1) From Jack Hazlewood of Amarillo, who years ago "happened to stumble on to Roy Rogers' contract with his movie studio (or maybe his agent)" in Nichols Encyclopedia of Legal Forms, this clause buried "deep in the fine print":Actor [Roy Rogers] shall never in performance… [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:59 am by texasbar
John Albach's "End of the World" contributions that appeared in the January 2000 column spawned two contributions of unusual, but very "nice" contract provisions:(1) From Jack Hazlewood of Amarillo, who years ago "happened to stumble on to Roy Rogers' contract with his movie studio (or maybe his agent)" in Nichols Encyclopedia of Legal Forms, this clause buried "deep in the fine print":Actor [Roy Rogers] shall never in performance… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Finally, the notion that federal law controlled infringement of registered trademarks but state law controlled unfair competition arose in the 1940s in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Erie Railroad v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 9:32 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Tomorrow morning, the Illinois Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Rogers v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Publ’ns Int’l Ltd., 996 F.2d 1366, 1379 (2d Cir. 1993)) (a title v. title and thus a non-Rogers case, because in the Second Circuit Rogers doesn’t apply to title v. title claims; the court also quotes Cliffs Notes, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 1:56 pm by marcorandazza
The DNC is playing the part of Roger Goodell in the 2016 election cycle. [read post]