Search for: "STATE v. HUNTER"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2007, 10:20 pm
The court followed Matter of Settlement Capital Corp v Yates 12 Misc 3d 1198(A) in stating that "fair and reasonable were to be evaluated on a case by case basis and the totality of the circumstances". [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
Justice Hathaway concurred in Justice Kelly’s dissent, and wrote separately to emphasize consternation at the Court’s failure to adhere to People v Hunter and to contest the evidence that the pilot program, and predeliberation jury discussions generally, enhance a jury’s ability to reach a fair result [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:34 am
For example, in a case like the 2002 SCOTUS decision in Verizon Md v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:58 pm
The statute at the time, Virginia Code Section 3.1-796.122 [currently Code Section 3.2-6570], stated that “[a]ny person who . . . [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
Hunter's Lessee, in which the Court informed Virginia that oh yeah, it did so have jurisdiction to hear appeals of state-court decisions on federal issues. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 10:58 am
United States of America v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:48 pm
(See the earlier brief.)Law professor Nan Hunter offers commentary here. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:15 am
South Bend, IN. 9:45 AM - Theron Hunter v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The case, Rostker v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
In defense of the contract Chief of Staff Hunter stated that “Morris County has paid millions to train officers who wind up leaving in a year”. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:16 am
©Copyright 2008 - The JAG HUNTER [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:02 am
The issue was squarely raised last week in Facebook v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
The decision explores the contours of the US Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
”—Thomas V. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:48 pm
In Red Wolf Coalition v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
" Turning to Petitioner's challenging the penalty imposed, of termination of his employment, as "excessive", the Appellate Division said in determining whether an imposed disciplinary penalty is excessive, "this Court must consider whether, in light of all the relevant circumstances, the penalty is so disproportionate to the charged offenses as to shock one's sense of fairness",* citing Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v County of Delaware, 202 AD3d at… [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
" Turning to Petitioner's challenging the penalty imposed, of termination of his employment, as "excessive", the Appellate Division said in determining whether an imposed disciplinary penalty is excessive, "this Court must consider whether, in light of all the relevant circumstances, the penalty is so disproportionate to the charged offenses as to shock one's sense of fairness",* citing Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v County of Delaware, 202 AD3d at… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday of this week in Schuette v. [read post]
