Search for: "STATE v. SUEING"
Results 341 - 360
of 14,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2020, 10:23 am
” Thomas acknowledged that the Supreme Court had ruled in 2011 in Sossamon v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 1:34 pm
But in at least some states, if the letter effectively persuades the debtor make even a tiny little payment on the debt, the statute of limitations may restart, and allow 'em to sue on the whole thing. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 5:37 pm
Sullivan (D.D.C.) ruled today in Blumenthal v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:50 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb [SCOTUSblog materials] focuses on whether plaintiffs may sue in a state that has no particular connection to them, but has significant connection to the defendant. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 10:32 am
SCOTUS granted cert before judgment in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:10 am
It is undisputed that the defendants failed to submit such "documentary evidence" when they filed the underlying claim in the Court of Claims and that the underlying claim was dismissed based on that pleading defect (Reed v State of New York, [*2]78 NY2d 1, 7; Gioeli v State of New York, 39 AD3d 815; Piccarreto v State of New York, 144 AD2d 920, 921; Heiss v State of New York, 143 AD2d 67, 69; Ivey v… [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 2:13 pm
But thanks to a filing yesterday in Walters v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:39 am
No private right of action against “state actors” pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights LawMcGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632, Decided January 28, 2009The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia.On September 25, 2003, McGovern filed a complaint of race… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
No private right of action against "state actors" pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights LawMcGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632, Decided January 28, 2009The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:29 am
Case in point: In Black v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:31 am
For example, one of the lawsuits cited by Paxton early in the complaint, Trump v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
The issue in the case is whether a plaintiff may sue a police officer for an interrogation that violates the rules announced in Miranda v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 8:45 am
Here are the materials in Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:05 pm
No private right of action against “state actors” pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights LawMcGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 5:29 pm
The Court in Transcore v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 11:28 pm
By Tierney Sneed, CNN *** CNN)A Texas state law that bans abortion after as early as six weeks into the pregnancy could provide the playbook for red states to pass extreme abortion restrictions — without having to wait for the Supreme Court to revisit Roe v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 3:57 am
” Kuhn v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am
Last Updated: July 12, 2011 Press Release: Valley Migrant Worker Sues Iowa Residents Over Alleged Hate Crime July 12, 2011 PHOTO: Rafael Trevino (eye) July 12, 2011 PHOTO: Rafael Trevino (face) July 12, 2011 First Amended Complaint United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Western Division July 12, 2011 [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
Under the self-care provision, a state worker may sue if the state interferes with the worker’s statutory right to a certain amount of leave due to a personal, debilitating health condition. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
There are three possibilities: First, under the doctrine of Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), a copyright owner can still sue a state in federal court for a prospective injunction requiring state officials to cease a continuing violation of federal copyright law. [read post]
