Search for: "See v. See"
Results 341 - 360
of 122,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Since the underlying legal malpractice claim is dismissed, the claim for disgorgement must be dismissed as well (see Cambridge Capital Real Estate Invs., LLC v Archstone Enter. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:22 am
I reported briefly on Kernott v Jones in this post, shortly after the judgment was published (for a far more comprehensive report see this post by Nearly Legal). [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:20 am
See also post 1, post 2, and post 3.One curiosity about State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
In its second intellectual property appeal (the first being Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 39 see my case note "Lucasfilm v Ansoworth The Supreme Court's First IP Appeal" 31 July 2011 IP/IT Update) the United Kingdom Supreme Court had to consider the way in which the requirement of industrial applicability extends to a patent for biological material. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:08 am
"Like our sister circuits that have considered this issue, see United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
The post State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:27 pm
Biogen Idec (see "Bilski v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 4:11 am
I've been reading the report of L v L (Ancillary Relief) in this month's Family Law, and am impressed by its clear logic in applying the guidance provided by the Court of Appeal in Charman (see this post). [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Supreme Court's recent decision in Concepcion and by other recent cases (see e.g., Smith v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:45 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:59 am
See below for the two latest filings in the CP Productions v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:37 am
See Seven Year Saga of Bakalar v. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 3:39 am
Standard YouTube LicenceJane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Mellor) Cabo Concepts Ltd v MGA Entertainment (UK) Ltd and another [2021] EWHC 491 (Pat) (4 March 2021)Yesterday I mentioned the cake wars between Marks & Spencer and Aldi over caterpillar cakes (see Jane Lambert Cake Wars 17 April 2021 NIPC News). [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
Lord LeggattBy Supreme Court of United Kingdom - Supreme Court of United Kingdom (see Terms and conditions) Licensed under the Open Government License v3.0, OGL 3, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php? [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:20 pm
See NAACP v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:45 pm
Kappos (previously Tafas v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 11:02 am
The brief of the Goldwater Institute in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:20 am
Monday, the Supreme Court held the Wal-Mart v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:54 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Directv, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
These are the general facts of Shipp v. [read post]
