Search for: "State v. Buchanan" Results 341 - 360 of 445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Super. 2010)Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PCIn recognition of their 2009 decision in Ranalli v. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 4:29 am by Michael C. Dorf
Or perhaps Republicans would simply nominate Trump for president and expect--with some justification given the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:54 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Buchanan The increasingly intense Republican efforts to energize their angriest voters with nonstop culture-war battles is truly a national effort. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm by Steve
We argued a similar limitations issue years ago in United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 7:11 am by Jocelyn Bosse
But the PVR owner does not get the monopoly on this descriptive name - in fact, others are obliged to use the denomination to describe the variety - and this means that PVR owners cannot register trade marks for the denomination: Buchanan Turf Supplies Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks [2015] FCA 756.Only one other domain name dispute has dealt with variety denominations -  albeit as a defence. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 7:30 am by David Bernstein
These laws were invalidated by a unanimous decision of the "conservative" Supreme Court in Buchanan v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 11:21 pm
  To borrow from Reyes v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
The case shows up in a database used by lawyers, but as Confidential v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
That is, let's suppose that in NYS Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:55 am
The Coordinator met with Title V, Medicaid, the DD Council, ICC, state legislators and Iowa's congressional delegation, as well as representing our children with other parent, disability and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:00 am
(SRIN004841) LACV006604 - Buchanan County, created 4/23/2008 and disposed of on 2/2/2010. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:03 pm by David Bernstein
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court did, in fact, adhere to a “libertarian philosophy” in one race case, Buchanan v. [read post]