Search for: "State of Maryland v. United States" Results 341 - 360 of 2,922
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 8:15 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration states distracted driver killed 3,450 people in the United States in 2016. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:Both the majority and concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Maoz, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, sold franchises for “quick-service” vegetarian restaurants in the United States. [read post]
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age… [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm by Florian Mueller
The states--led by the Beehive State--are (in alphabetical order): Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, D.C. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
The granted issues in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 6:37 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
The Miranda Rights are rooted in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
       ALEC also has taken strides in coopting progressives seeking an Article V convention to reverse Citizens United. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:27 am
A Towson, Maryland rehabilitation center has been sued by the United States Department of Labor for allegedly mishandling employees' retirement contributions. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
The case itself notes:Classen owns the following United States Patent Numbers: (1) 6,420,139 ("the 139 patent"); (2) 6,638,739 ("the 739 patent"); (3) 5,728,385 ("the 385 patent "); and (4) 5,723,283 ("the 283 patent") (collectively, "the patents in suit"). [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:55 pm
Argument was held on May 10, 2011 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Liberty University, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
”  The purpose of this provision is to avoid pleading in the alternative if a Court decides during the trial that the information is not a trade secret.This provision, adopted by other states from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (USTA), has divided courts across the United States into three camps, although Maryland has not examined it in detail. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]