Search for: "State v. High"
Results 341 - 360
of 32,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2012, 5:42 pm
The recent decision of the Australia High Court in Andrews v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 8:50 am
Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell and Daniel Mach of the American Civil Liberties Union led an interactive discussion with high school students, starting with a preview of the case and then addressing questions related to the separation of church and state. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm
In the case of R (on the application of the BBC) v Secretary of State for Justice ([2011] EWHC 13 (Admin)) the High Court ruled that the Justice Secretary’s refusal to grant the BBC permission to have and to broadcast a face-to-face interview with terrorism suspect Babar Ahmad was unlawful. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 12:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
In Blair v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
But that’s precisely what happened last month when the high court handed down Bullcoming v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:48 am
High Court (Administrative Court) AB, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWHC 2220 (Admin) (04 September 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Mireskandari v The Law Society [2009] EWHC 2224 (Ch) (04 September 2009) High Court (Commercial Division) Kommune & Anor v DEPFA ACS Bank [2009] EWHC 2227 (Comm) (04 September 2009) High Court [...] [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:58 am
by Dennis Crouch Allen v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm
On February 4, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Supreme Court has sent Weyerhaeuser Company v United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 586 U. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
[v] Despite the preemption of state causes of action, 46 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
[v] Despite the preemption of state causes of action, 46 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 11:32 am
Trump v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:54 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Secretary of State for the Home Department v AE [2008] EWHC 585 (Admin) (20 March 2008) High Court (Family Division) S v S [2008] EWHC 519 (Fam) (19 March 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench division) Oakes v Neininger & Ors [2008] EWHC 548 (QB) (19 March 2008) High Court (Patents Court) Symbian Ltd v Comptroller General Of Patents [2008] EWHC 518 (Pat) (18 March 2008) [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
Baker v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 9:16 am
Mississippi AG Jim Hood has developed quite a specialty in talking about things that are supposed to be secret, like his state grand jury investigations last year and the recent settlement in the State Farm v. [read post]
