Search for: "Stone v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 2,143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am by Adam Baker
But they had included a note with their bid documents essentially stating that their pricing was based on a certain amount of backfill type fill but if more stone fill was in fact required then their unit price was to be adjusted. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 3:30 am by Kerri Lynn Stone
Kerri Lynn Stone In Male Same-Sex “Horseplay”: The Epicenter of Sexual Harassment? [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 3:17 pm
Va. considers a search claim on the merits under AEDPA rather than dismissing it under Stone and finds that the decision of the state courts was supported by the evidence and legally correct. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing special harm… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing special harm… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:15 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
All of this makes me wonder if the Court is effectively, if covertly, expanding the doctrine of Stone v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:32 am by Michael O'Hear
All of this makes me wonder if the Court is effectively, if covertly, expanding the doctrine of Stone v. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am by Eric Goldman
The defendant is the Bye, Goff firm, based in River Falls, Wisconsin with other in-state offices. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:23 pm
The legal (and music) world is abuzz in response to Chief Justice John Roberts citing Bob Dylan in his dissent in Sprint v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
Beer Pong shots c/o WikipediaA recent High Court decision (Breakthrough Funding v Nearby Media [2017] EWHC 2271 ch) follows on from an interim injunction which was granted by Arnold J earlier in the year. [read post]