Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2020, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm
Press 2008); Charles Lane, The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, the Supreme Court, and the Betrayal of Reconstruction (Henry Holt & Company 2008); and United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
The tax treatment of dual-income earners in a family comes from social and legal assumptions the tax code makes when evaluating the nature of taxable units. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
No. 1J v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 1:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 8:05 am
Taylor was put in a cell in a prison psychiatric unit for mental health treatment. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" * See Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
" * See Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
* See Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
* See Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 7:55 am
United States, in which the IRS used a ‘John Doe’ summons that sought the identity of clients for whom the law firm had performed certain work. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
The trial court relied on United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
That would be fitting, because if this fine book is ultimately about one thing, it surely would be debate itself—the deep and fundamental debate that roiled the early United States and transformed it into a new kind of constitutional republic. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:05 pm
On May 1, 2020, in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:32 am
United States v. [read post]