Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2019, 10:28 am
(discussing misperception that CDA 230 causes platforms to tolerate such speech). [77] Snyder v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Such support services can create the large economies-of-scale in the production process that affordability for middle- and lower-income people require. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am
Given our visibility, we know they're serious people, bent on destruction. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:43 am
” Well, on a scale of 1 to 10 for loathsome, Phelps gets a 12, but so do Neo-Nazis and some other people, and they’ve got First Amendment rights, too. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm
We the People adopted constitutional changes outside of the procedure stipulated in Article V. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:48 pm
Supreme Court case entitled, Jacobson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:48 pm
Supreme Court case entitled, Jacobson v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 12:28 pm
(Doe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:48 am
I won't attempt to defend my views on this one, and reasonable people can (and surely do) disagree. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:43 pm
I thought that Roe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 4:36 pm
In 2013 the Supreme Court, in Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm
Nevertheless, the People object to his diversion into treatment, arguing that the allegations concerning his possession of a large quantity of cocaine and money, a scale, and ammunition indicate that he is a drug dealer, not a drug addict. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm
For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:08 am
This can leave many people unprepared when facing drug charges. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:59 pm
Perhaps the scale and importance of social media is best represented in numbers. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 3:40 pm
In A.C. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:44 pm
In today’s case (Sauer v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 6:13 am
Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:17 pm
The Court rejected Facebook’s argument that the class definition was overly broad and that it had several problems, including that the class definition: (i) has no temporal limitations; (ii) does not address the fact that many users use false names or unidentifiable portraits; (iii) does not address the fact that Sponsored Stories were used for non-commercial entities as well as for businesses; (iv) does not address the necessary element of lack of consent; and (v)… [read post]
