Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Woods" Results 341 - 360 of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am by Eric Turkewitz
In addition to trying to keep the civil suits at bay, we tracked the grand jury investigation of Woods closely for more than a year – interviewing each of the many people brought before the grand jury – before Woods became unable to afford the representation. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Alito Jr. would have the Court’s opinion in Harris v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
  He accidentally hit a bit of wood, sliced a chunk of skin off her head, and knocked her out of the chair. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Woods, No. 07-51491 In an appeal of a sentence for distributing crack cocaine, imposition of a supervised-release condition forbidding defendant from residing with any person to whom she was not ceremonially married or related by blood is vacated where the condition was overbroad and involved a greater deprivation of liberty than was reasonably necessary to achieve sentencing purposes. [read post]
7 May 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Even a perceptive journalist like Zoe Williams was confused, not able to see the wood for the trees in such a long judgment. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Clear labelling of incentivised posts is required under UK consumer protection law, so that people are not misled. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am by Raffaela Wakeman
A bomb went off in Katmandu, Nepal, killing at least three people. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 10:13 am by Margaret Wood
  The first drawing was a New York state criminal case, People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
On 14 October 2015, HHJ Graham Wood QC gave judgment in the case of Elliott v Staffordshire Police dismissing a slander claim arising out of comments made in a child protection conference. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:14 pm
  The number of people who have the horsepower and reputation to truly deserve a Supreme Court appointment is pretty small. [read post]