Search for: "Time Inc. Home Entertainment "
Results 341 - 360
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm
., 10 N.Y.3d 200, 886 N.E.2d 135 (2008) In these cases, the Court of Appeals ruled for the first time that a policyholder may recover consequential damages against property insurers if the insured shows that the damages were foreseeable and contemplated by the parties at the time of contracting. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:16 am
Case Background On June 29, 2010, Roxanne McClellan was babysitting at her home for Christine Whetstone’s two daughters, O.C. and L.C. who were just over five and two at the time. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
The Social Media Law Bulletin has examined the issue of whether a state law can prevent a social media site from publicly posting accurate age information about individuals in the entertainment industry after the decision in California. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am
United States, 18-460, five times before denying cert. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In an important judgment in the case of Duffy v Google Inc ([2015] SASC 170) Blue J in the South Australian Supreme Court found that Google is legally responsible when its search results link to defamatory content. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
Azerbaijan On 13 June 2024, the ECtHR held that here had been an infringement on the Article 10 free expression rights in the case of RFE/RL Inc. and others v Azerbaijan (Application no. 56138/18). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Patent Docs‘ Kevin Noonan talks about the latest case in which the Federal Circuit assessed the scope of foreseeability for rebutting prosecution history estoppel, Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
Pack opined the mock event music was inaudible as measured at the three monitored homes. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
Inc., Admin. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
At Time Inc. she was the assistant to the Chairman of the Board. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
The Spanish Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Google Spain on the right to be forgotten, which means that claims concerning the right to be forgotten should be submitted directly to Google Inc in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
But the Wyndham lawsuit was dismissed in late 2014, and since that time there really have been no additional significant cyber security-related D&O lawsuits filed, even though there have been a number of high profile data breaches in the interim (including, for example, Home Depot, Anthem and Sony Entertainment). [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
This notice period is designed to allow for time to review the agreement and negotiate the terms of their employment. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 6:15 pm
Invocation of Force Majeure clause invalid and was escapism on part of the Plaintiff to refrain from executing those obligations 4 HIGH COURT OF DELHI Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. vs Vedanta Limited & Anr. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
Seyfarth Synopsis: Employers in California: be aware and prepare for new laws increasing minimum wages and mandating overtime pay for agricultural employees; expanding the California Fair Pay Act to race and ethnicity and to address prior salary consideration; imposing new restrictions on background checks and gig economy workers; and more. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am
At the time, federal obscenity laws (18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:25 pm
Personally, as I said to the Los Angeles Times some time ago, “I think that anything that can poison or kill a person should be listed as an adulterant [in food]. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:59 am
Personally, as I said to the Los Angeles Times some time ago, “I think that anything that can poison or kill a person should be listed as an adulterant [in food]. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:22 am
Personally, as I said to the Los Angeles Times some time ago, “I think that anything that can poison or kill a person should be listed as an adulterant [in food]. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:50 pm
Personally, as I said to the Los Angeles Times some time ago, “I think that anything that can poison or kill a person should be listed as an adulterant [in food]. [read post]
