Search for: "United States v. Holmes" Results 341 - 360 of 773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by David Kimball-Stanley
Judge Milan interpreted the phrase by looking to its use in other contexts, relying principally on Holmes v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Vitale, “declaring that the state may not compel the recitation of a state-composed prayer in schools” Griffin v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:06 am by Maya Manian
” It was not until Nazi Germany adopted American eugenic theory and practice that public opinion about eugenics ultimately shifted in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
  Kennedy's majority opinion in that case insisted on deferring to a legislative judgment that safe alternatives to partial birth abortions existed, even though every reputable medical organization in the United States disputed that claim. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:04 am by Peter Vodola
Co., 13 N.Y. 31 [1855]), and a few decades later the United States Supreme Court rejected it also (Grigsby v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm by Big Tent Democrat
The President's power, as stated in Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution: The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:48 am by Scott Bomboy
United States, a majority of the Court upheld the act, but Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes dissented, with Justice Louis Brandeis agreeing with Holmes. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression 12 v. (1946-1948) Office of United States Chief of Counsel. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:21 pm by Sandy Levinson
Relatively few Americans are willing to denounce the basic legitimacy of the Court--in the way, say, that I regularly denounce the legitimacy of the indefensibly apportioned United States Senate. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:02 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Nor does he quote Holmes, dissenting in Abrams v. [read post]