Search for: "United States v. Kennedy" Results 341 - 360 of 4,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am by Katherine McCoy
In contrast, in a concurring opinion, Justice Kennedy concluded that “waters of the United States” includes wetlands with a “significant nexus” to traditional navigable waters. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am by Holly
January 5, 2023  |  By: Ryan Kennedy On November 7, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Virginia decided the case of Harrell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:02 am
Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am by Dan Stein
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Amendment reads in full: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:46 am by Federalist Society
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am by Paul M. Hauge
United States, which resulted in a 4-1-4 decision featuring multiple tests for determining whether a particular wetland could be considered as falling within the statutory category of “waters of the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am by Paul M. Hauge
United States, which resulted in a 4-1-4 decision featuring multiple tests for determining whether a particular wetland could be considered as falling within the statutory category of “waters of the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am by Paul M. Hauge
United States, which resulted in a 4-1-4 decision featuring multiple tests for determining whether a particular wetland could be considered as falling within the statutory category of “waters of the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:36 am
The transcript of today’s argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:02 pm
Justice Souter filed a brief concurrence, printed here in its entirety: I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]