Search for: "United States v. Powell" Results 341 - 360 of 832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Title VI states: No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 12:35 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeDeportee's Sentence Vacatur Motion Denied; Claim Would Have Been Successive Habeas Petition United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
First, it states the “sense of Congress” that the president “shall not withdraw the United States from NATO,” and that “the case Goldwater v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
Nakanishi, john a. powell, Maria Blanco, Howard Winant Indigenous Peoples: Response to the Periodic Report of the United States to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Tribal Self-Government in the United States John Dossett When Affirmative Action Was White Ira Katznelson The Importance of Targeted Universalism john a. powell, Stephen Menendian & Jason Reece Implicit Bias A Forum – eds. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am by Kalvis Golde
Imprecision aside, Justice Potter Stewart, who joined the majority in Furman, boldly predicted that “the death penalty in the United States was finished. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
In Powell v United Kingdom (Admissibility) (45305/99) (2000) Inquest LR 19 ECHR the Strasbourg Court did not accept that ordinary medical negligence resulting in the death of a patient was in itself a breach of Article 2. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
No. 40145/98)]; residents of a slum that was engulfed by a methane explosion from a neighbouring tip [Oneryildiz v Turkey (2004) 41 EHRR 20l]; and a local authority moving an elderly resident between care homes [Watts v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR 66]. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am by SHG
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]