Search for: "United States v. Stark" Results 341 - 360 of 738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The answer is complex, simply because it depends on: the actual compensation arrangement being proposed the application of federal law (including Stark and anti kickback rules) to the extent it applies and state law governing self-referral, fee-splitting, kickbacks, and patient brokering Federal law contains numerous exceptions to Stark and "safe harbors" under anti-kickback law. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 7:55 am by The Boyd Law Group, PLLC
Issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on August 12, 2019, Naumovski v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am by INFORRM
The “argument grounded in jurisprudence” concerns developments in the United States and the Commonwealth (at [66] et seq.). [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
John Marsh, Russell Beck, and I just recorded another episode of the Fairly Competing podcast (which will be available Tuesday morning), and we discussed the latest chapter in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:24 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “President Trump stood next to President Vladimir V. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:18 am by Neoshia Roemer
In light of highly destructive recent court decisions like Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:21 am by Ronald Mann
” Finally, the Court rejected Siegel’s reliance (seconded by the United States Trustee) on its 2007 decision in Marrama v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:50 pm by David Lat
Of course, experts in this area — including some Obama-supporting liberals — told us that Citizens United wasn’t that big a deal.)Thanks to last year’s juicy Obama v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm by LTA-Editor
In the United States, the Second Circuit in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1928), foregrounded a right to privacy, an idea that would only later become a core part of liberalism, with Supreme Court decisions such as Griswold v. [read post]