Search for: "YOUNG v. STATE" Results 341 - 360 of 8,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2018, 1:02 pm by John Wright
9th Circuit Court of Appeals Renders Open Carry of Firearms Legal On July 24, 2018, the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held in Young v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:55 am by Jeremy Feigenbaum
As recounted most exhaustively by Judge Jay Bybee in his opinion in Young v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:35 am by Scott Andrews
Young, 2001-0715 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/20/02), 813 So.2d 562, 569-570, writ denied, 2002-1079 (La.6/21/02), 819 So.2d 335; and Duzon v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:02 am
Here is the abstract.The First Amendment expressive associational freedom analysis of the 2000 mid-culture-wars case of Boy Scouts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm by Orin Kerr
Copyright protection in the United States was “effectively unavailable for pornography” until the landmark decision by the Fifth Circuit in Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am by CMS
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, Egbert has no bearing on Disney's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against state officials (where both a federal statute and the doctrine of Ex Parte Young provide causes of action).Even so, as Prof Buchanan observed in his essay here yesterday, there is a prima facie similarity between Disney's lawsuit and the challenge to the third version of Trump's Travel Ban that SCOTUS rejected in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
We hope you were able to join us for our July Fast Break on the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
We hope you were able to join us for our July Fast Break on the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]