Search for: "Zimmerman v State" Results 341 - 360 of 390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2024, 11:24 am by Eric Goldman
If that were enough for state action, every large government contractor would be a state actor. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:22 am
" We cited nearly unanimous appellate precedent, from the Supreme Court on down, to the effect that:A federal court in diversity is not free to engraft onto those state rules exceptions or modifications which may commend themselves to the federal court, but which have not commended themselves to the State in which the federal court sits.Day & Zimmerman, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 5:30 pm
The case I'm talking about is Western Filter Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The dissent also notes that any reputational harm can be redressed civilly, but states have long-abandoned criminal libel (even though many states have some laws on the books). _ Wow, Golb’s creativity in his email campaigns is matched by New York State’s creativity in fashioning criminal restrictions on speech! [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
They may also read the classic ethics case, Spaulding v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Steve Hall
  And: Weeks’s ruling—the first invocation of the new Racial Justice Act—was the first step in repairing the damage done by one of the Supreme Court’s most notorious holdings: McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by Ken White
It's not as bad as the genuinely awful probable cause affidavit against George Zimmerman, but it's sloppy, and bad practice. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
‘, May 2012 Diane Leenheer Zimmerman, New York University School of Law, ‘The ‘New’ Privacy and the ‘Old’: Is Applying the Tort Law of Privacy Like Putting High-Button Shoes on the Internet? [read post]