Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 3581 - 3600 of 3,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Householder embarks here on a “systematic reevaluation of the basic policy and principles of American copyright law by returning to the source of such law, the Copyright Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:48 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Finally, I want to end with Nimmer’s prediction about the prospect of a new copyright act in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States, a case that for the first time declared a right of privacy in the conversation that an individual has in a public telephone booth. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench reviewed similar situations in the United States and considered how the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:41 am by Peter Mahler
The first was a May 2015 letter from the LLC’s managing member to petitioner, discussing a plan to renovate one of the property’s units. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:36 am by Marvin Ammori
These doctrines include the Supreme Court's doctrines of overbreadth, vagueness, and prior restraint, as well as its decisions in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]