Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 3581 - 3600
of 19,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2020, 5:09 am
Which way next for Nokia v Daimler? [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am
The Press explains:On March 8, 1971, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a case, Griggs v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:30 am
This first week marks the first argument sitting for Justice Busby and the first for Justice Bland since 2006, when she was chosen to sit by designation in a case that was re-argued after two of the regular justices had recused themselves (Hyundai Motor Company and Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:04 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
., the Court will hear argument in Herring v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 3:47 am
Ginsburg also made her mark on intellectual property law, from patent law decisions such as Microsoft Corp v AT&T, to copyright in Eldred v Ashcroft. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:59 am
Plaintiff sues defendant alleging trademark infringement of a registration described as a 'design' or 'configuration' mark. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 3:24 am
" Towers v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 9:03 am
" United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm
The wall of separation between Church and State (Everson v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:32 am
” Thomas & Betts Corp. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:26 am
For publication opinions today (2): In Mark Dorman and Tracy Dorman v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Certification marks have been available at a national level in some member states (e.g. the UK, Germany) for a while, but the lack of EU-wide marks has led to inconsistent certification regimes/standards, and geographical gaps in certification. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
His position is revealed in his judgment (another masterly summary of the relevant law, it goes almost without saying) where he states:... [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
" Mark Moller of the Cato Institute also agreed with this view, stating here that Court didn't really set a "high bar" for the EPA going forward. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:04 pm
" The Court said a presumption of administrative preclusion is also supported by United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 11:30 pm
Sec. 1071(b) of the Trademark Act, seeking review of the Board's decision in Ballet Tech Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:09 am
The sentence was vacated and remanded.Congratulations to Mark Werner and Tony Gallagher of the Montana Federal Defenders (Billings) for the win.U.S. v. [read post]
