Search for: "U. S. Appeal of" Results 3581 - 3600 of 6,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2015, 5:38 am by Meagan Martin and Pat Muldowney
” When another employee asked what he was supposed to do about the strike because he could not afford to lose his insurance due to a medical condition that would cause him to go blind without injections, one of the responses posted on the page said: “If u cross . . . you will lose your eyesight but from the 2 black eyes [Union member] is gonna give u lol. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:21 am by Liskow & Lewis
The district court upheld but slightly modified the award, each party appealed to the Ninth Circuit, and the Ninth Circuit reversed in favor of Mattel. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:21 am
Thus, a court may not impose `[u]nreasonable burdens’ upon them. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:46 pm
§ 1201.14(p)).For more information,  contact The Jeffrey Law Group, PLLC, The Federal Employee’s Law Firm®,  at 202.312.7100. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:55 pm by Stephen M. Ozcomert
But the court of appeals concluded that it could not say with a reasonable probability that counsel’s arguments changed the trial result. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
The Court of Appeals took a different view – one that tracks with the arguments from U Oregon Law Prof Mohsen Manesh and Stanford Law’s Joe Grundfest set forth in this amici brief and reiterated post-decision in this blog on UCLA Law Prof Steve Bainbridge’s site. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:25 pm by David Greene
Courts have consistently applied this rule to social media platforms, including the 9th Circuit’s recent decision in Prager U v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court's decision notes that in denying ST’s request for the identification card, the Superintendent considered the IAB's report and ST’s personnel records. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Colucci, 2021 SCC 24 (CanLII) [1] This appeal centres on the appropriate framework for determining applications to retroactively decrease the amount of child support owing or forgive child support arrears under s. 17 of the Divorce Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 3 (2nd Supp.). [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:00 pm
Sarah's scholarship focuses on the connections between law and cultural norms. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:07 am by Daniel Schwartz
  Second, the decision is likely going to be appealed to the federal Courts of Appeals and then, if necessary, the U. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 7:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
 However, prior to the appeal of that sanction-order being completed the USPTO cancelled the infringed claims (reexamination finding affirmed on appeal). [read post]