Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 3601 - 3620 of 8,597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2009, 10:25 pm
Although it would be invidious to single out any of the speakers for special mention, this programme has some novelties this time around:*  Dawn Osborne  (Rouse) offers the latest wisdom on internet-related trade mark infringements, ketwords, adwords and internet auctions;* Ian Karet  (Linklaters) will be laying bare some of the mysteries of patent infringement in the light of recent case law, also touching on the ongoing battle for the heart of software… [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:59 am by John McFarland
That is what happened in the latest condemnation case decided by the Texas Supreme Court, Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:33 am by Joshua Cohen
The requirements were as follows: The transferor did not fully appreciate the nature and consequence of his/her action(s); andThe transferee was instrumental in procuring the transfer (i.e. played an active role).The doctrine was adopted by Canadian courts; however, seldom adjudicated on, laying dormant for the past 100 years; until now… A Mother Gifts Funds to A Child Over Several Years In Gefen v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 4:03 pm
The only IP action this week on the Curia agenda is Case T-460/05 Bang & Olufsen v OHIM, an appeal to the Court of First Instance against OHIM's refusal to register as a Community trade mark an "haut parleur", which even the Kat can translate into a loudspeaker. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:34 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Vancouver attorney Ashley Bozek of McCarthy Tetrault on the firm’s blog, Lay of the Land Five Questions and Answers About the Second Circuit’s SEC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:00 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- New Jersey attorney Deirdre Wheatley-Liss of Fein, Such, Kahn & Shepard on her New Jersey Estate Planning & Elder Law Blog How to Set Up a Business in Japan (And Other Business Wisdom) - Florida lawyer Santiago Cueto of Cueto Law Group on his blog International Business Law Advisor Fixing The Injustice of Ashcroft v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 3:22 pm
Shearman & Sterling has not responded to our multiple requests for comment, but several sources independently confirm that Shearman is laying off roughly 5% of its litigation associates and some associates in other practice groups. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:11 pm
“The ‘Dawn Donut rule,’ arising from Dawn Donut Company, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:14 am by Brian Cordery
Michele Wales (InHouse Patent Counsel, US) provided the immediate contrast: whilst, once upon a time, functional claims were acceptable in the US, the 2017 decision of the Federal Circuit in Amgen v Sanofi changed all that. [read post]