Search for: "People v. Short" Results 3601 - 3620 of 8,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2019, 6:21 pm
"Rumpole: "And this applies to people convicted pre-trial? [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:23 pm by Larry
The product at issue is acrylamide tertiary butyl sulfonic acid or ATBS, for short. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 6:59 am by Andrew Koppelman
Smith argues, at Law and Liberty, that the Supreme Court’s Bostock v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 5:52 am
In fact, UC Berkeley scholar Renjun Bian analysed all publicly available final patent infringement cases decided by local people’s courts in 2014, which amounted to a total of 1,663 patent infringement judgments. [read post]
In a tremendous step forward for our right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has held in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:18 pm
 For the record, earlier Sky v Avalon interim injunctive relief litigation, here, was the subject of a helpful guest Katpost by Gill Grassie, here.Hot technology: a car batterythat fits your LEGO set? [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 5:10 am by Jon Hyman
— via Mike Haberman’s Omega HR Solutions Why the majority and dissenting opinion in the Ninth Circuit case of Weaving v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am by Jon L. Gelman
Monsanto knew that studies supporting the safety of Roundup were invalid when the Pilliods [Plaintiffs] began spraying Roundup in their yards, wearing no gloves or protective gear, spurred on by television commercials showing people spraying Roundup wearing shorts, and undeterred by any label or product information to suggest warning or caution. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm
"The Strange World of IP Consents", launched on Friday afternoon as the fourth item down in the IPKat's Friday Fantasies feature, already has over 50 people registered. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:00 pm by Mitch Stoltz
On Friday, the major US movie studios quietly backed away from the worst parts of the censorship power-grab they attempted in July in the Paramount v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am by David Smith
The fact that a consultation was in favour of the charging scheme or that most people believe that fixed charges are cheaper than metered supply does not amount to a presumption of fairness. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am by David Smith
The fact that a consultation was in favour of the charging scheme or that most people believe that fixed charges are cheaper than metered supply does not amount to a presumption of fairness. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:34 pm by Amy Howe
  But Justice Breyer urged him to articulate a more generally applicable standard, one that “people can understand. [read post]