Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 3601 - 3620 of 4,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2015, 10:25 pm by Aaron Feigelson
It’s not an understatement to say that the NTP v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:52 am by Judith G. McMullen
  Gradually, the pendulum swung towards defendants’ rights, and beginning with Coy v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
While I’m not aware of any New York cases directly addressing the issue, a recent decision by Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle of the Tennessee Business Court in Wilford v Coltea, Case No. 15-856-BC [Tenn. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
However, the effectiveness of irradiation in controlling both plant and human pathogens depends on the initial quality of the iceberg lettuce or spinach coming from the field and processing plant prior to irradiation. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
Federalist Society Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation Thursday, January 6, noon-1PM In West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:31 pm
That mark would be pronounced as two syllables and not three, contrary to what the Board of Appeal stated as an alternative in its decision. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:58 am by Tian Lu
Examples of such misfortune include the ‘Aspirin’ for acetylsalicylic acid in the United States (Bayer Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 10:12 am by Aaron Jue
EFF has adamantly defended encryption and its widespread use from the early days of Bernstein v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:17 am by Erik J. Heels
Many of the seeds for tomorrow’s startups are planted here. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]