Search for: "People v Justice A." Results 3641 - 3660 of 23,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2020, 12:52 pm by Donna Bader
In recent rulings, the Supreme Court filed several decisions that will make some people angry and others happy: In Trump v. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 1:09 pm by NARF
Opposition surfaces as deadline nears to ratify tribal water settlement in Arizona Justice Department plans tribal consultations after Castro-Huerta ruling [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:33 pm by Unknown
Peyote crisis confronting modern Indigenous peoples: The declining peyote population and a demand for conservation. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am by Patrick Quinlan
The people who founded our country, and those who then wrote the Florida Constitution, were very afraid of some small group of people gaining too much power and using that power to control our government and the fate of We the People. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am by Patrick Quinlan
The people who founded our country, and those who then wrote the Florida Constitution, were very afraid of some small group of people gaining too much power and using that power to control our government and the fate of We the People. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am by Adam Feldman
Many people seems to be wondering how Judge Brett Kavanaugh will vote in abortion cases if confirmed to the Supreme Court, and more specifically if he will vote to overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am by seo
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The court examined Lord Woolf’s class of people from whom “higher standards of conduct can rightly be expected by the public”. [read post]