Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 6,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
Rufe is a judge on the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:28 am
(See United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
In an unusual move, the United States filed a brief supporting further review. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Yesterday’s second grant, in Lozman v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm
Bush v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
United States, upholding the internment of Japanese-Americans by a 6-3 decision. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
When King v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:41 pm
United States (1944), the Court approved the President’s executive order in which 120,000 individuals were confined to internment camps based solely on their Japanese ancestry. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm
By the end of the 19th century, a significant minority of states had such laws. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Tough questions greeted counsel for both sides of this case—a seemingly mundane dispute about playgrounds and tire scraps that has potentially wide-ranging implications for the contours of religious liberty in the United States. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
The advocates of racial equality never comprised a majority of the U.S. population, but they were the successors to the abolitionist minority that led the United States to end slavery: as Professor William Miller writes in Arguing About Slavery: “[T]here were some people--a very small number, on the margin of society, condemned and harassed -- who nevertheless made it the first order of their life’s business to oppose American slavery, and to insist that it was… [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
The advocates of racial equality never comprised a majority of the U.S. population, but they were the successors to the abolitionist minority that led the United States to end slavery: as Professor William Miller writes in Arguing About Slavery: “[T]here were some people--a very small number, on the margin of society, condemned and harassed -- who nevertheless made it the first order of their life’s business to oppose American slavery, and to insist that it was… [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
These requirements are similar to those prescribed in the United States by Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d, as amended by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-220), August 7, 1998). [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:43 am
In the past few years, those without religious belief, whether they consider themselves atheist, agnostic, humanist, secular, or freethinker, have become much more prominent in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:07 am
Joanna Stergiou v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:48 pm
Previously, attention had focused mainly on a few major state court cases, along with Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 11:48 pm
The Survey is intended as a service to fellow teachers and students of conflicts law, both within and outside the United States. [read post]
