Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 7,098
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am
United States, next term’s case stemming from the “Bridgegate” controversy in New Jersey that asks whether a public official defrauds the government of its property when she provides a public-policy reason for an official decision that is not her actual reason, “a conflux of fascinating law and facts. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:15 am
Second, the United States Constitution was enacted mainly under such rules. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:20 am
The United States, on the other hand, is correct not tolerate human rights abuses in the United States even if it would be permissible in the home country of the diplomat. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm
United States, 134 S. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 7:40 am
Constitution, not the states. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:01 am
White asserted that “while in an international sense Porto [sic] Rico was not a foreign country, since it was owned by the United States, it was foreign in a domestic sense, because the island had not been incorporated into the United States, but was merely appurtenant thereto as a possession. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 9:39 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 1:44 pm
Root Consulting Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
TERRY, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
If this kind of Islam grows and prospers in the United States - and this is already happening - it will not stay there. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
For example, in Hurst v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 9:20 am
”] As the United States Supreme Court has stated, [w]hatever differences may exist about interpretations of the First Amendment, there is practically universal agreement that a major purpose of that Amendment was to protect the free discussion of governmental affairs. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:23 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The decision is Sarhan v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:29 pm
Attorney General's Office objected, stating that the population makeup of the state (78% white, 20% black, and 1% each Native American and Asian) made a single majority-minority district insufficient. [read post]
