Search for: "cf" Results 3641 - 3660 of 5,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 8:26 am by Tobias Thienel
It also requires that every case be considered on its own particular merits, with little room being available for one-size-fits-all treatment through hard and fast rules (cf. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(Formally, the problem with plaintiff’s argument is that it doesn’t have a copyright on “Ed Sullivan’s creative effort,” but rather on an episode of the Ed Sullivan show; cf. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm by Armand Grinstajn
As regards the decision T 587/98, which might also be considered (cf. the Guidelines C-VI, 9.1.6), it is noted that this decision, in contrast to T 797/02, is not concerned with cascaded divisional applications, but rather with the problem of double patenting, and that the A <--> A plus B situation referred to in this decision does not prevail in the present case since none of the claims of the parent application as granted includes al1 the features of present claim 1 plus an… [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 12:45 pm by Kenneth Anderson
 As I remarked in my last post, blowback is always a consideration, but a second order strategic issue (Cf. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:38 am
Johnson, 207 F.3d 773, 775 (5th Cir.2000) (reviewing a district court's denial of equitable tolling for abuse of discretion but noting that de novo review applies where district court denies equitable tolling as a matter of law); cf. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:40 pm by Volker 'Falk' Metzler
  Even though it is not binding either on the EPO or on users and their representatives, it gives some interesting insight into the workflow the EPO wished applicants and representatives to follow (cf. also here). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Div. 2d Dep't 2012) (statements characterizing plaintiff's essay as "racist and anti-Semitic" are non-actionable opinion); cf. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:03 pm by renholding
See Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance, “CF Disclosure Guidance: Topic No. 2” (Oct. 13, 2011), available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/cfguidance-topic2.htm. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:00 pm
Supp. 2d 16, 21-22 (D.D.C. 2001) (holding that the ESA does not require listing “simply because the agency is unable to rule out factors that could contribute to a population decline”); cf. [read post]