Search for: "Lowe v. Lowe"
Results 3661 - 3680
of 14,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 12:41 pm
., Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:47 am
[vii] Even if you took out one “outlier” judge (there is a statistical way of determining an “outlier” in a data set) Chicago’s spread (high judge v. low judge) remained significant at 32.9 percent and the standard deviation (judges clumped together v. judges spread apart) remained relatively high at 8.2. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
Briseno v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
Briseno v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 10:23 am
In Experi-Metal v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:45 am
Two years ago Judge Posner wrote an opinion in Apple v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
This is a `rather low threshold’. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:35 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
In Dastar v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
The story of Michigan v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 8:14 am
Courts initially followed the Lusardi v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am
With more than 5.9 million[1] Texans (approximately 18.9% of the current population[2]) enrolled in Medicaid, it is an essential program for qualifying low-income citizens. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the recent judgment of the High Court of England and Wales in the Lifestyle Equities v Berkshire Polo trade mark dispute. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 12:30 am
In contrast, the prior art antibodies only showed low agglutination in certain formats, for example as single chain fragments (scFv) as opposed to full-length antibodies. [read post]
30 May 2022, 10:24 am
The Nokia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
On the contrary, as aptly set out in the UK case of Sawkins v Hyperion [2005] EWCA Civ 565 (a country that traditionally envisaged originality as a low threshold and as requiring just skill, labour or effort):A work may be complete rubbish and utterly worthless, but copyright protection may be available for it, just as it is for the great masterpieces of imaginative literature, art and music. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:03 pm
Yick Wo v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
This issue came up a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
